The Hyper-Texted Body, Or Nietzsche Gets A Modem
Arthur Kroker and
Michael Weinstein
Why be nostalgic? The old body type was always OK, but the wired body with
its micro-flesh, multi-media channeled ports, cybernetic fingers, and bubbling
neuro-brain finely interfaced to the "standard operating system" of the Internet
is infinitely better. Not really the wired body of sci-fi with its mutant
designer look, or body flesh with its ghostly reminders of nineteenth-century
philosophy, but the hyper-texted body as both: a wired nervous system embedded
in living (dedicated) flesh.
The hyper-texted body with its dedicated flesh? That is our telematic future,
and it's not necessarily so bleak. Technology has always been our sheltering
environment: not second-order nature, but primal nature for the
twenty-first-century body. In the end, the virtual class is very old-fashioned.
It clings to an antiquated historical form-capitalism-and, on its behalf, wants
to shut down the creative possibilities of the Internet. Dedicated flesh rebels
against the virtual class. It does not want to be interfaced to the Net through
modems and external software black boxes, but actually wants to be an
Internet. The virtual class wants to appropriate emergent technologies for
purposes of authoritarian political control over cyberspace. It wants to drag
technotopia back to the age of the primitive politics of predatory capitalism.
But dedicated (geek) flesh wants something very different. Unlike the (typically
European) rejection of technotopia in favor of a newly emergent nostalgia
movement under the sign of "Back to Vinyl" in digital sound or "Back to Pencils"
in literature, dedicated flesh wants to deeply instatiate the age of
technotopia. Operating by means of the aesthetic strategy of over-identification
with the feared and desired object, the hyper-texted body insists that ours is
already the era of post-capitalism, and even post-technology. Taking the will to
virtuality seriously, it demands its telematic rights to be a functioning
interfaced body: to be a multi-media thinker, to patch BUS ports on its
cyber-flesh as it navigates the gravity well of the Internet, to create
aesthetic visions equal to the pure virtualities found everywhere on the now
superceded digital superhighway, and to become data to such a point of violent
implosion that the body finally breaks free of the confining myth of "wired
culture" and goes wireless.
The wireless body? That is the floating body, drifting around in the debris
of technotopia: encrypted flesh in a sea of data. The perfect evolutionary
successor to twentieth-century flesh, the wireless body fuses the speed of
virtualized exchange into its cellular structure. DNA-coated data is inserted
directly through spinal taps into dedicated flesh for better navigation through
the treacherous shoals of the electronic galaxy. Not a body without memory or
feelings, but the opposite. The wireless body is the battleground of the major
political and ethical conflicts of late-twentieth-and early-twenty-first-century
experience.
Perhaps the wireless body will be just a blank data dump, a floating
petrie-dish where all the brilliant residues of technotopia are mixed together
in newly recombinant forms. In this case, the wireless body would be an
indefinitely reprogrammable chip: micro-soft flesh where the "standard operating
system" of the new electronic age comes off the top of the TV set, flips inside
the body organic, and is soft-wired to a waiting vat of remaindered flesh.
But the wireless body could be, and already is, something very different. Not
the body as an organic grid for passively sampling all the drifting bytes of
recombinant culture, but the wireless body as a highly-charged theoretical and
political site: a moving field of aesthetic contestation for remapping the
galactic empire of technotopia. Data flesh can speak so confidently of the
possibility of multi-media democracy, of sex without secretions, and of
integrated (cyber-) relationships because it has already burst through to the
other side of technotopia: to that point of brilliant dissolution where the Net
comes alive, and begins to speak the language of wireless bodies in a wireless
world.
There are already many wireless bodies on the Internet: Many data travellers
on the virtual road have managed under the weight of the predatory capitalism of
the virtual class and the even weightier humanist prejudices against geek flesh,
to make of the Internet a charmed site for fusing the particle waves of all the
passing data into a new body type: hyper-texted bodies circulating as "web
weavers" in electronic space.
Refusing to be remaindered as flesh dumped by the virtual class, the
hyper-texted body bends virtuality to its own purposes. Here, the will to
virtuality ceases to be one-dimensional, becoming a doubled process, grisly yet
creative, spatial yet memoried, in full violent play as the hyper-texted body.
Always schizoid yet fully integrated, the hyper-texted body swallows its modem,
cuts its wired connections to the information highway, and becomes its own
system-operating software, combining and remutating the surrounding data storm
into new virtualities. And why not? Human flesh no longer exists, except as an
incept of the wireless world. Refuse, then, nostalgia for the surpassed past of
remaindered flesh, and hyper-text your way to the (World Wide) Webbed body: the
body that actually dances on its own data organs, sees with multi-media
graphical interface screens, makes new best tele-friends on the MOO, writes
electronic poetry on the disappearing edges of video, sound, and text
integrators, and insists on going beyond the tedious world of binary divisions
to the new cyber-mathematics of FITS. The hyper-texted body, then, is the
precursor of a new world of multi-media politics, fractalized economics, incept
personalities, and (cybernetically) interfaced relationships. After all, why
should the virtual class monopolize digital reality? It only wants to suppress
the creative possibilities of virtualization, privileging instead the tendencies
of technotopia towards new and more vicious forms of cyber-authoritarianism. The
virtual class only wants to subordinate digital reality to the will to
capitalism. The hyper-texted body responds to the challenge of virtualization by
making itself a monstrous double: pure virtuality/pure flesh. Consequently, our
telematic future: the wireless body on the Net as a sequenced chip
micro-programmed by the virtual class for purposes of (its) maximal
profitability, or the wireless body as the leading-edge of critical subjectivity
in the twenty-first century. If the virtual class is the post-historical
successor to the early bourgeoisie of primitive capitalism, then the
hyper-texted body is the Internet equivalent of the Paris Commune: anarchistic,
utopian, and in full revolt against the suppression of the general (tele-)human
possibilities of the Net in favor of the specific (monetary) interests of the
virtual class. Always already the past to the future of the hyper-texted body,
the virtual class is the particular interest that must be overcome by the
hyper-texted body of data trash if the Net is to be gatewayed by soft ethics.
Soft ethics? Nietzsche's got a modem, and he is already rewriting the last
pages of The Will to Power as The Will to Virtuality.
As the patron saint of the hyper-texted body, Nietzsche is data trash to the
smooth, unbroken surface of the virtual class.
In the interests of promoting debate on the politics of the Internet, the above
is excerpted from Arthur Kroker and Michael A. Weinstein, Data Trash: The
Theory of the Virtual Class, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1994, and
Montreal: New World Perspectives, 1994. CTHEORY welcomes comments on the fate of
the Internet in the age of the virtual class.